|
Anja PRŠA, Jože KRANJEC
Zgodovinski arhiv Celje, Slovenija
Sodelovanje pristojnega arhiva in imetnika arhivskega gradiva na primeru podjetja Vegrad Velenje
Collaboration between the Archives and Creators of Archival Records on the Example of the Vegrad Velenje Company
(Moderna arhivistika 2018, 1 (2), str/pp. 409-426)
https://doi.org/10.54356/MA/2018/WYST2312
Izvleček:
Namen prispevka je predstaviti primer dobre prakse in uspešnega sodelovanja med pristojnim arhivom (Zgodovinski arhiv Celje) ter imetnikom arhivskega gradiva (Vegrad Velenje, d. d. - v stečaju). Prispevek se v večji meri nanaša na časovno obdobje, ko je bilo podjetje Vegrad že v stečajnem postopku in je moralo poskrbeti za izročitev arhivskega gradiva, hkrati pa tudi za nadaljnjo hrambo preostalega dokumentarnega gradiva, ki ga arhiv ni prevzel. Prispevek je sestavljen iz dveh delov; prvi prikaže potek dogodkov in medsebojno sodelovanje arhiva in imetnika, drugi pa, do kolikšne mere se je uporaba teoretičnih znanj s področja arhivistike lahko prenesla v praktično delo na terenu. Prikazuje izziv, kako so se morala ustaljena pravila arhivske stroke prilagajati sprotnim ugotovitvam pri delu na gradivu ustvarjalca.
Ključne besede:
stečaj, hramba gradiva, izročitev arhivskega gradiva, popis, zakonodaja
Abstract:
Collaboration between the Archives and Creators of Archival Records on the Example of the Vegrad Velenje Company
The purpose of the article is to present an example of good practice and successful cooperation between the competent archives (Historical Archives Celje) and the holder of archives (Vegrad Velenje, etc. - in insolvency). The article is mostly related to the time during which Vegrad was already in bankruptcy proceedings and had to provide for the delivery of archival material while at the same time provide for further storage of the remaining documentary material which was not taken by the archive. The article consists of two parts: the first one presents the course of events and the mutual cooperation between the archives and the holders while the second shows the extent to which the use of theoretical knowledge in the field of archival science can be transferred to practical work on the ground. It presents the challenge of how the established rules of the archival profession should be adapted to the current findings of work on the creator's material.
Key words:
Insolvency, storage of materials, delivery of archives, inventory, legislation.
|
